i had a critique of my research-to-date recently. i consider it to have been a highly constructive discussion. it often seems that these reviews neglect to provide a significant springboard for further lines of enquiry [or indeed further inward reflection], and so i am left to imagine why i consider this critique a success. and i consider that success as something to do with how engaged i felt my critters were. of course, and as always, my perception of the review could be unhelpfully biased, and so i look to my peers and tutor for further insight.
off the cuff, a few challenges are set before me.
to translate/evolve my work into three dimensions
to spend some time looking for black